PRE-ISSUE QA CHECKLIST — ICT DRAWING PACKAGE
=============================================================
Free template from ICT Design Partners — ictdesignpartners.com
Run by someone OTHER than the author, against a named standard
set, before any package leaves the office. ~20 minutes that
catch most of what otherwise surfaces as field RFIs.
=============================================================
Project: ______________  Set/Rev: ______  Reviewer: ________
Date: ____ / ____ / ______   Standards basis: BICSI TDMM,
ANSI/TIA-568/-569/-606/-607, NEC + AHJ amendments, project spec

SHEET MECHANICS
[ ] Sheet index matches the actual sheets (count, titles, revs)
[ ] Every sheet: correct title block, project no., rev, date
[ ] Revision clouds + deltas match the rev narrative
[ ] North arrows and scales present and correct
[ ] Cross-references resolve (details, sections, "see sheet X")

PATHWAYS & SPACES
[ ] Tray/conduit sizing shown and within fill limits (calc
    referenced, not implied)
[ ] Pathway separation from power per TIA-569 noted where close
[ ] TR/ER layouts: working clearances, door swing, plywood,
    dedicated outlets, lighting noted
[ ] Riser/sleeve locations match between floor plans and risers
[ ] Fire-rated penetrations identified with firestop callouts

CABLE PLANT
[ ] Horizontal lengths within channel limits (worst-case run
    checked, not the average)
[ ] Backbone strand/pair counts match riser diagram and BOM
[ ] Fiber loss budgets calculated and on the drawings
[ ] Cable types/ratings match the environment (plenum/riser/OSP)

GROUNDING & ADMINISTRATION
[ ] TBB/TGB/bonding shown per TIA-607, sized, and routed
[ ] Labeling scheme stated on the drawings and consistent with
    the project's TIA-606 convention
[ ] Outlet IDs on plans match the schedule (spot-check 10)

COORDINATION
[ ] Overlaid against current architectural backgrounds (right rev!)
[ ] Checked against mechanical for tray/duct conflicts
[ ] Checked against electrical for shared pathway and power needs
[ ] AHJ/permit comments from prior cycles addressed and closed

PACKAGE
[ ] Spec sections referenced actually exist in the spec book
[ ] BOM quantities spot-checked against plans (pick 5 lines)
[ ] General notes current (no boilerplate from another project)
[ ] Responsible-party block + seal/signature space correct

Findings (cite the standard for each):
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________

Result:  [ ] Cleared to issue   [ ] Corrections required
No warranty; adapt to your practice. The checklist is the
floor, not the ceiling.