<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ICT Design Partners — Insights</title>
    <link>https://ictdesignpartners.com/insights</link>
    <atom:link href="https://ictdesignpartners.com/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>RCDD-authored field notes on ICT design, structured cabling, OSP, and standards.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>What 'RCDD-certified design' actually commits the designer to</title>
      <link>https://ictdesignpartners.com/insights/rcdd-stamping-explained</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ictdesignpartners.com/insights/rcdd-stamping-explained</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Clients ask for it. Few teams agree on what it means. A plain-language explainer for contractors and design firms.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TIA-606-C labeling, made cheap and durable</title>
      <link>https://ictdesignpartners.com/insights/tia-606-labeling</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ictdesignpartners.com/insights/tia-606-labeling</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>The standard is fine. The shop drawings often are not. Three principles that survive contact with the field crew.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OSP loss budgets you can defend in a closeout meeting</title>
      <link>https://ictdesignpartners.com/insights/osp-loss-budget</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ictdesignpartners.com/insights/osp-loss-budget</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>A defensible single-mode OSP fiber loss budget built from TIA standards, with a worked structure you can reuse to size links and pass closeout testing.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The three objections to remote ICT design, answered</title>
      <link>https://ictdesignpartners.com/insights/remote-design-objections</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ictdesignpartners.com/insights/remote-design-objections</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Stamping, coordination, and site presence. Where the objections are real and where they are inherited from an older workflow.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A short QA checklist that catches most package issues</title>
      <link>https://ictdesignpartners.com/insights/qa-checklist</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ictdesignpartners.com/insights/qa-checklist</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>A short, repeatable BICSI/TIA peer-review QA checklist anyone on the team can run before an ICT design package leaves the office, against a fixed list.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sequencing in-building DAS with structured cabling</title>
      <link>https://ictdesignpartners.com/insights/das-coordination</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ictdesignpartners.com/insights/das-coordination</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Why in-building DAS coordination belongs in schematic design, not the rough-in scramble: how to sequence distributed-antenna pathway with structured cabling.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
